#6 Shopping As the "Other"

Shopping As The "Other"


I visited Dissmores IGA for this assignment like I normally would to load up on groceries. Dissmores is one of the more expensive supermarkets in the Pullman-Moscow area because of their close proximity to the WSU campus. Like many students I shop at Dissmores for convenience. Because Dissmores is linked to WSU they are very good targeting students shoppers.



Dissmores dose a great job at catching the eye of students with displays, sales, and placement around the store. The very first thing I saw as I walked into the store was a giant display of Budweiser and Coors products. Accompaning the beer was another display of Tostitos chips and dip and Tims Cascade Chips. In case your a not shopping for beer there was also a giant display of Monster energy drinks and Coca-Cola products. As I walked around I noticed some of the products on sale. Many of these products are directed specifically at college students who don't cook, products like frozen pizza, Banquet meals, Hot Pocket products, and frozen chicken wings.

Dissmores has a giant beer selection which covers half of an entire isle in the store. This is clearly one of their largest sellers towards college students. Dissmores strategiclly chooses to place snack foods and soda in the same geographic area as the beer section. I noticed they moved the wine across the store where college students are less likely to look and maybe local adults are more likely to shop. All of these items are placed where they are for a reason. It not only makes it easy to remember where things are, but it also can create a higher demand for certain products.

I decided to imagine myself as a 10 year old child shopping at Dissmores and found that there was plenty of products geared towards me. I found fruit snacks with cartoon characters, fruit shaped candy, fruit flavored sugar cereal, fruit drinks like Capri Sun, and of corse popsicles and ice cream. One sticker I found stood out to me, it was about cart level in the frozen food isle. It was an advertisement for popsicles and ice cream that claimed they were homework fuel, and a great snack for after school.

Here are a few blogs I found about supermarkets and food targeted towards children.

http://bit.ly/uoQmKt

http://bit.ly/ayClR0

I have realized how painful it was for my mom taking me to the grocery store as a child. I remember trying to sneak all kinds of junk food into our cart. But what child can resist? Every kid who goes grocery shopping is bombarded by brands targeted at them. With bright colors, sugary foods, and friendly characters did I really have a choice?



I found very few food choices for young children which were actually healthy. Many snacks that are geared towards children are created to resemble fruit, giving the illusion of being good for you. Marketing to children has become an issue worth fighting against in our country. The Center For Science In The Public Interest has been one of the strongest advocats of this behavior. Check out some of their innititiaves and the second link about marketing to kids.
http://bit.ly/tfCth4

http://bit.ly/uFEGo2

In some ways we can have a say in what is on our grocery shelfs. Last year one of the Dissmores managers asked me what  he could add to their selection. I told him I was looking for a large bag of basic trail mix, that was relatively cheap. This semester I found exactly what I was looking for the year before. So in some ways people can have some say in what their supermarket sells.


For the most part consumers don't have a choice about what foods are sold at their local market. The large scale food companies, IGA, Safeway, QFC, Wallmart, Thriftway, ect decide what is on our shelves.

The illusion of supply and demand is also very real. Grocery stores don't always stock their shelves with the highest selling products they  choose what to supply, or supply what their business partners tell them to supply. Although demand dose play a role in what these stores are buying they also put things on their shelves that are not highly demanded.

#5 Consumer Freedom

Consumer Freedom

After watching the video on our blog prompt by the Center for Consumer Freedom http://bit.ly/2hovuh I was not convinced they were truly fighting for the consumer's best interest. I felt like this video was more propaganda than anything else. I was a little suprised to see them call out the Center for Science in the Public Interest http://bit.ly/e8Fl5, and PETA http://bit.ly/a55SEt. Not that I am a big supporter of either, I think it is important to research more about some of the issues before I decide where I stand.

When I researched more about the Center for Consumer Freedom I found that they call themselves "a nonprofit organization devoted to promoting personal responsibility and protecting consumer choices." Sounds good...


 The Center for Consumer Freedom makes a good point that what Americans eat should not be dictated by small groups of people. The CCF claims they were founded to counter groups which tell us how to live our lives like PETA. The CCF even claims that these organizations think we are too stupid to choose for ourselves.




But don't all of these groups have good agendas like protecting animals and fighting obeasity? I thought this was odd, and I began to realize what the CCF is all about.


I explored more about the Center for Science in the Public Interest and found that they are fighting many food related issues in our country. Including food labeling, marketing to kids, excessive salt, soft drinks, trans fats, and fast food menues. Many Americans do not think about what they are eating, rather they eat what is cheap, tasty, or convenient. 


So what would Raj Patel think about the Center for Consumer Freedoms claims? I think he would ask about who the CCF is targeting? I think they could be targeting fat white people from the middle and lower classes with little education.






Patel might also ask the CCF, dose everyone have choice or do only a select few choose what we consume? Choice is an illusion, and I think Patel would point out that the CCF is helping create this illusion. Some people think choice is Taco Bell vs. Burger King thanks to mirage artists like the CCF.




I think Patel would point out that organizations like the Center for Science in the Public Interest are not trying to control what we consume rather these groups are trying to take control away from the corporations who already dictate consumers. The majority of Americans don't even have a choice about what they eat, they only eat what they can afford and what is convenient to buy. We eat what is placed in front of us. I pick Granny Smith apples when I go grocery shopping because Guavas are not sold at Dissmores, not because I would rather have apples over Guavas.
  






When watching the video for blog #5 its hard to tell if the CCF is working in the consumer's interest because they don't mention anything about how the consumer's choices are already controlled. The CCF refuses to mention anything about how corporations control America, but rather attacks groups who are fighting against real issues in our country, like obeasity. The CCF is more about ripping off consumers and confusing them with PR bullshit than protecting our choices. The CCF is only a front, set up to benefit large corporations who get away with exploiting the world and its people.






Bottleneck corporations use their power to control both consumers and producers. Money is the carrot placed in front of our face. Along with the thought and dream that one day peasants can earn some of the wealth controlled by corporations. Corporations control their power and image with advertising, PR, and good old fashioned deception. Large corporations use Rick Berman AKA "DR. Evil" to battle activist groups. His expertise in public relations allows him to craft and bend the publics perception. Power is wielded through third parties like Berman Co. who simply lie to consumers.






This gentleman is a little "extreme" but he makes some great points about the CCF, like who pays them? http://bit.ly/sexneq





http://bit.ly/rT5xEL Here is another video I found while researching.
Read more at the center for consumer deception. http://bit.ly/aR8cHO






http://bit.ly/v0ZXfu Here is another one... "Smells like money."






Consumption can shape the market but consumers must organize and use their numbers to out weigh the few with power. Michael moore made a great comparison in his recent documentary, Capitalism A Love Story, when he said that every dollar we spend is like a vote. In a way its true, we choose which product we like more or which product is better. Boycotts can work if enough people participate. But on the other hand, some corporations control a monopoly which can negate our ability to shape the market.


Consumer freedom is a good concept. I agree with its principals but not with the CCF. I think we should have freedom to choose what we want to buy without paying extra for what we want. But at the same time massive companies in the fast food, tobacco, and alcohol industries have become rich by killing their consumers. Ethics needs to triumph profits, but it rarely dose in America. This is part of our issue with internationalism.


In America we have "sin taxes" on tobacco and alcohol and I think it is fair to tax fast food harder too. I think if we know products like these are harmful they need to be strictly regulated so people who don't know better don't ruin their lives before they learn better. It is clear that people of minority, lower social status, and with less money have less consumer freedom. The cost of consumption is poverty and everything that goes along with it including poor health care, education, employment, housing, pollution, and more. This is the cost that the peasants pays in order for the royalty of our country to prosper. Groups like the CCF are ways for our royalty to erase the damage caused by their greed and production.  

#4 The Battle In Seattle: 1999 World Trade Organization Protests

The protests in Seattle surrounding the World Trade Organization (WTO)Ministerial Conference of 1999 was a domenstration that drew world wide attention to the social injustices surrounding free trade and globalization. This was a three day movement protesting global trading agencies like the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the World Trade Organization. Protesters had issues with the rules and actions of these organizations because of the injustice surrounding their policies.

The stage was set for a controversial meeting between these organizations on November 30th (N30) in downtown Seattle. This meeting is where the different protest groups began to form demonestration plans months before N30. Nearly 100,000 protesters flooded the streets of downtown Seattle. These protesters included students, human rights groups, environmental groups, religious groups, union members, and many more activists.

Here is another blog which takes a look at the WTO riots-

http://bit.ly/nSqUxh

Seattle is one of the leading exporters of all cities in America. In many ways it was fitting for the WTO to hold its meeting in the city. While Seattle has consistently supported free trade and the WTO it is also home to many outspoken activist groups. Giant corporations also call Seattle home including Microsoft, Boeing, Weyerhaeuser, and Starbucks. Many of these companies were targeted by protesters on N30.

Here is a video showing footage of the domenstration in Seattle.

http://bit.ly/pv0iq5

Some of the diverse groups responsible for organizing the Battle in Seattle were the Direct Action Network, the Rainforest Action Network, Art & Revolution, and the Ruckus Society. Other groups joined the protest including the AFL-CIO and Anarchists from Eugene AKA the Black Blocs. The planning of these groups was very detailed. They had stratagies to overtake intersections and create blockades against the police.

http://bit.ly/oCOX9g

The majority of protesters were non-violent, but there were some that were destroying property and attacking police.

Police arrested thousands and battled protesters with tactics like pepper spray, curfews, rubber bullets, and tear gas. The Seattle police department declared a state of emergency. This led to more arrests and violence.

Here is a website describing some of the chaos around the protests.

http://bit.ly/pXqLaO


Much of the national media coverage was focused on this violence and less about the issues behind the protests. The media was very limited by the massive corporations who controlled their agendas. Protesters were labled as anti-trade and left-wingers without any real cause.

Here is a chapter titled "Netwar In The Emerald City: WTO Protest Strategy and Tactics" out of Paul de Armond's report.
http://bit.ly/pppwtI

The success of the three day demenstration is still hard to determine. The WTO conferences were disrupted and Seattle Police Chief Norm Stamper resigned but how much did this disrupt the policies of the WTO, World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund? Did it improve free trade at all?

This movement did a great job of bringing awareness to the issues of free trade and it led to many other protests across America. I think this movement's full impact is still to be seen, because it may provide a stepping stone to a more progressive movement.






Earlier this month President Obama signed and approved a free trade agreement with South Korea, Columbia, and Panama. This agreement is monumental for all of those involved. Everyone is forced to adjust to the new trade agreement. Some industries like U.S. agriculture are going to export more and benefit. But how will that affect the agriculture industries in Columbia, South Korea, and Panama. Other industries like the U.S. textile industry are expected to suffer from the import of cheeper goods. I think this is relavent to the WTO protests in Seattle because president Obama required that there be 9 policies agreed to reguarding labor ritghts. The question is weather these requirements are actually going to improve work conditions and the injustices surrounding free trade around the world.

Read/Listen to the NPR report.
http://n.pr/qKk0LY


I was born (1990) and raised in Seattle but the issues behind these protests were never really explained to me. I obvisouly knew about the protests, but I was too young to understand the issues behind the smoke and mirrors of the media. One thing I do remember is the violence between police and protesters, including the excessive use of pepper spray. Local news reports covered this extensively, but not injustices that led to this protest.

This movement was significant in many ways. It was one of the largest protests since the Vietnam War. It was also one of the first protests to take advantage of the internet. This development was the first step towards some of what we are seeing today with the #OccupyWallStreet movement. I think the Battle in Seattle could be a stepping stone towards social change.

#3 Roots of Justice

Roots of Justice: Mississippi Freedom Summer

In the Summer of 1964 the efforts of poor southern blacks made a difference across the country. Racism in America came to a boiling point. This boiling point was centered around voting rights for African Americans in the State of Mississippi.

Whites in Mississippi controlled the state government and used their political power, wealth, and force to alienate blacks in the community. Almost half of Mississippi's population was balck; but only 5% was registered to vote.

Freedom Summer was a movement to solve this issues by registering the black community to vote. This movement grew larger than Mississippi and affected the whole civil rights movement. Freedom Summer was only possible because of the industrious work of volunteer organizations in Mississippi.

These groups organized the Mississippi community to take action and obtain their voting rights. They used their numbers for different techniques such as sit-ins, voter registration campaigns, canvassing, and marches. These tactics built confidence and the movement began to grow. One key to the success of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, Salomon points out, was that people were given a stake in the movement. The organizers built close relationships with their members and the community.

In 1962 Revolutionary organizations like the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party (MFDP), the NAACP, and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) began the battle to earn voting rights for blacks in Mississippi. They joined forces in this battle by creating the Council of Federated Organizations (COFO). 

The issues that the COFO attacked in their battle for fair voting right were acts like the grandfather clause, poll taxes, and literacy tests; all part of the white's repertoire to control the government of Mississippi. Lynching blacks in public was another tactic used to intimidate those who were disrupting order in the white community. Aside from lynchings, mobs of whites and the KKK attempted to instill fear in the black community with violence and threats.

Police departments and courthouses across Mississippi were racist. Trials like U.S. v. Cecil Price et al. are perfect examples of this. Defendant Cecil Price was a county sheriff in Mississippi, and an active KKK member. In 1964 he was linked to the murder of three civil rights workers, Andrew Goodman, Michael Schwerner, and James Chaney. Sherif Price and six other defendants were convicted. Price served less than  5 years. Time magazine covered the story and printed this two-page photo of the county sheriff. Corruption, discrimination, racism, and violence were all common techniques of the Mississippi law enforcement.

http://bit.ly/aUcIKJ

Follow this bitly link to read more about U.S v.  Cecil Price.

 The racism in Mississippi, before, and up to 1964 was uncompromising. Whites refused to change their ways, while the majority of the country began to. Salomon writes of a turning point in the battle for civil rights after three major killings captured the outrageous violence tactics used by whites in 1960. The three volunteers; Medgar Evers, Louis Allen, and Herbert Lee, were leaders and unsung heros who lost their lives fighting racism and discrimination. In the wake of the Georgia execution of Troy Davis I thought it would be worth investigating deeper into these murders.


Medgar Evers was a veteran of World War II and also Mississippi's first NAACP field secretary; a major accomplishment due to the strong opposition of whites. In 1944 Evers went to the Decatur county courthouse with other war veterans to demand the right to vote, he was met by a mob of armed whites. Later he was involved with boycotts of white stores and led the desegregation the University of Mississippi. In 1962 Evers was responsible for the enrollment of many black students into Ole Miss, including James Meredith. This led to an on campus riot, killing two people. As a prominent black leader and revolutionist, Evers was the target of many violent attacks including a molotov cocktail and an attempted attack by the driver of a car; both in 1963. Days after the attempted hit and run, Evers was gunned down outside of his Jackson home. The accused murder was not convicted of by two different juries composed solely of white males. 30 years later, with new evidence, De La Beckwith was brought to justice for Evers homicide.

Louis Allen was also a veteran of WWII, after his service he became a logger and civil rights activist in Liberty Mississippi. The Allen murder is a cold case, like many other homicides in Mississippi during the era. Louis was not a trouble maker but he witnessed the murder of Herbert Lee (below) by a powerful Mississippi State representative E. H. Hurst. Mr. Allen said he was threatened into lying about what he saw. Later his moral coumpss directed him to reveal the truth. He approached the FBI and said he lied about the self defense by E. H. Hurst because he feared for his life. After coming forward to the FBI about the Herbert Lee murder, Louis Allen received a lot of backlash in the community and decided to move away from Mississippi. The day before he was planned to move, he was shot in the head outside his home. The lack of a true investigation during the time shows how corrupt and racist the law enforcement was during the era.

Watch the 60 Minute piece on this case.

http://bit.ly/ePrbSB

Here is another blog I found which is based on the 60 Minute piece about Louis Allen.

http://bit.ly/hdc80x


Herbert Lee was the man murdered in front of Louis Allen by a member of the Mississippi State Legislature, E. H. Hurst. This happened on Sept. 25, 1961 in Liberty Mississippi. Hurst was aquitted after witness Louis Allen was pressured to say he saw Hurst attacked by Lee. Hurst never spent a night in jail.

http://bit.ly/rcCUqB





I never knew about Freedom Summer until I began reading Roots of Justice. Those who battled racism and Jim Crow in Mississippi were only a handful of the thousands of Civil Rights heros who have allowed our country to grow to the place it is at today. Without Freedom Summer I do not think we would be led by President Barrack Obama. Freedom Summer This is an accomplishment that has grown from the seeds planted in Mississippi in the early 1960s. Although Jim Crow has been abolished, racism, inequality, and discrimination still exist in America. The example of Troy Davis is one where America refuses to acknowledge this racism and injustice. There are many similarities between Troy Davis and the three men I wrote about from the Civil Rights movement in Mississippi.

http://bit.ly/p8cvtP



The power of the vote controls our freedoms as Americans. The struggle for voting rights was vitally important to African Americans taking they're destiny into they're own hands. The political environment in which these seeds were planted was one of revolution and change. In some ways it is similar to that of ours today. I think Civil Rights leaders knew this was an opportunity to vault their movement onto a national level and dig up our country's roots of justice.