#4 The Battle In Seattle: 1999 World Trade Organization Protests

The protests in Seattle surrounding the World Trade Organization (WTO)Ministerial Conference of 1999 was a domenstration that drew world wide attention to the social injustices surrounding free trade and globalization. This was a three day movement protesting global trading agencies like the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the World Trade Organization. Protesters had issues with the rules and actions of these organizations because of the injustice surrounding their policies.

The stage was set for a controversial meeting between these organizations on November 30th (N30) in downtown Seattle. This meeting is where the different protest groups began to form demonestration plans months before N30. Nearly 100,000 protesters flooded the streets of downtown Seattle. These protesters included students, human rights groups, environmental groups, religious groups, union members, and many more activists.

Here is another blog which takes a look at the WTO riots-

http://bit.ly/nSqUxh

Seattle is one of the leading exporters of all cities in America. In many ways it was fitting for the WTO to hold its meeting in the city. While Seattle has consistently supported free trade and the WTO it is also home to many outspoken activist groups. Giant corporations also call Seattle home including Microsoft, Boeing, Weyerhaeuser, and Starbucks. Many of these companies were targeted by protesters on N30.

Here is a video showing footage of the domenstration in Seattle.

http://bit.ly/pv0iq5

Some of the diverse groups responsible for organizing the Battle in Seattle were the Direct Action Network, the Rainforest Action Network, Art & Revolution, and the Ruckus Society. Other groups joined the protest including the AFL-CIO and Anarchists from Eugene AKA the Black Blocs. The planning of these groups was very detailed. They had stratagies to overtake intersections and create blockades against the police.

http://bit.ly/oCOX9g

The majority of protesters were non-violent, but there were some that were destroying property and attacking police.

Police arrested thousands and battled protesters with tactics like pepper spray, curfews, rubber bullets, and tear gas. The Seattle police department declared a state of emergency. This led to more arrests and violence.

Here is a website describing some of the chaos around the protests.

http://bit.ly/pXqLaO


Much of the national media coverage was focused on this violence and less about the issues behind the protests. The media was very limited by the massive corporations who controlled their agendas. Protesters were labled as anti-trade and left-wingers without any real cause.

Here is a chapter titled "Netwar In The Emerald City: WTO Protest Strategy and Tactics" out of Paul de Armond's report.
http://bit.ly/pppwtI

The success of the three day demenstration is still hard to determine. The WTO conferences were disrupted and Seattle Police Chief Norm Stamper resigned but how much did this disrupt the policies of the WTO, World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund? Did it improve free trade at all?

This movement did a great job of bringing awareness to the issues of free trade and it led to many other protests across America. I think this movement's full impact is still to be seen, because it may provide a stepping stone to a more progressive movement.






Earlier this month President Obama signed and approved a free trade agreement with South Korea, Columbia, and Panama. This agreement is monumental for all of those involved. Everyone is forced to adjust to the new trade agreement. Some industries like U.S. agriculture are going to export more and benefit. But how will that affect the agriculture industries in Columbia, South Korea, and Panama. Other industries like the U.S. textile industry are expected to suffer from the import of cheeper goods. I think this is relavent to the WTO protests in Seattle because president Obama required that there be 9 policies agreed to reguarding labor ritghts. The question is weather these requirements are actually going to improve work conditions and the injustices surrounding free trade around the world.

Read/Listen to the NPR report.
http://n.pr/qKk0LY


I was born (1990) and raised in Seattle but the issues behind these protests were never really explained to me. I obvisouly knew about the protests, but I was too young to understand the issues behind the smoke and mirrors of the media. One thing I do remember is the violence between police and protesters, including the excessive use of pepper spray. Local news reports covered this extensively, but not injustices that led to this protest.

This movement was significant in many ways. It was one of the largest protests since the Vietnam War. It was also one of the first protests to take advantage of the internet. This development was the first step towards some of what we are seeing today with the #OccupyWallStreet movement. I think the Battle in Seattle could be a stepping stone towards social change.

#3 Roots of Justice

Roots of Justice: Mississippi Freedom Summer

In the Summer of 1964 the efforts of poor southern blacks made a difference across the country. Racism in America came to a boiling point. This boiling point was centered around voting rights for African Americans in the State of Mississippi.

Whites in Mississippi controlled the state government and used their political power, wealth, and force to alienate blacks in the community. Almost half of Mississippi's population was balck; but only 5% was registered to vote.

Freedom Summer was a movement to solve this issues by registering the black community to vote. This movement grew larger than Mississippi and affected the whole civil rights movement. Freedom Summer was only possible because of the industrious work of volunteer organizations in Mississippi.

These groups organized the Mississippi community to take action and obtain their voting rights. They used their numbers for different techniques such as sit-ins, voter registration campaigns, canvassing, and marches. These tactics built confidence and the movement began to grow. One key to the success of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, Salomon points out, was that people were given a stake in the movement. The organizers built close relationships with their members and the community.

In 1962 Revolutionary organizations like the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party (MFDP), the NAACP, and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) began the battle to earn voting rights for blacks in Mississippi. They joined forces in this battle by creating the Council of Federated Organizations (COFO). 

The issues that the COFO attacked in their battle for fair voting right were acts like the grandfather clause, poll taxes, and literacy tests; all part of the white's repertoire to control the government of Mississippi. Lynching blacks in public was another tactic used to intimidate those who were disrupting order in the white community. Aside from lynchings, mobs of whites and the KKK attempted to instill fear in the black community with violence and threats.

Police departments and courthouses across Mississippi were racist. Trials like U.S. v. Cecil Price et al. are perfect examples of this. Defendant Cecil Price was a county sheriff in Mississippi, and an active KKK member. In 1964 he was linked to the murder of three civil rights workers, Andrew Goodman, Michael Schwerner, and James Chaney. Sherif Price and six other defendants were convicted. Price served less than  5 years. Time magazine covered the story and printed this two-page photo of the county sheriff. Corruption, discrimination, racism, and violence were all common techniques of the Mississippi law enforcement.

http://bit.ly/aUcIKJ

Follow this bitly link to read more about U.S v.  Cecil Price.

 The racism in Mississippi, before, and up to 1964 was uncompromising. Whites refused to change their ways, while the majority of the country began to. Salomon writes of a turning point in the battle for civil rights after three major killings captured the outrageous violence tactics used by whites in 1960. The three volunteers; Medgar Evers, Louis Allen, and Herbert Lee, were leaders and unsung heros who lost their lives fighting racism and discrimination. In the wake of the Georgia execution of Troy Davis I thought it would be worth investigating deeper into these murders.


Medgar Evers was a veteran of World War II and also Mississippi's first NAACP field secretary; a major accomplishment due to the strong opposition of whites. In 1944 Evers went to the Decatur county courthouse with other war veterans to demand the right to vote, he was met by a mob of armed whites. Later he was involved with boycotts of white stores and led the desegregation the University of Mississippi. In 1962 Evers was responsible for the enrollment of many black students into Ole Miss, including James Meredith. This led to an on campus riot, killing two people. As a prominent black leader and revolutionist, Evers was the target of many violent attacks including a molotov cocktail and an attempted attack by the driver of a car; both in 1963. Days after the attempted hit and run, Evers was gunned down outside of his Jackson home. The accused murder was not convicted of by two different juries composed solely of white males. 30 years later, with new evidence, De La Beckwith was brought to justice for Evers homicide.

Louis Allen was also a veteran of WWII, after his service he became a logger and civil rights activist in Liberty Mississippi. The Allen murder is a cold case, like many other homicides in Mississippi during the era. Louis was not a trouble maker but he witnessed the murder of Herbert Lee (below) by a powerful Mississippi State representative E. H. Hurst. Mr. Allen said he was threatened into lying about what he saw. Later his moral coumpss directed him to reveal the truth. He approached the FBI and said he lied about the self defense by E. H. Hurst because he feared for his life. After coming forward to the FBI about the Herbert Lee murder, Louis Allen received a lot of backlash in the community and decided to move away from Mississippi. The day before he was planned to move, he was shot in the head outside his home. The lack of a true investigation during the time shows how corrupt and racist the law enforcement was during the era.

Watch the 60 Minute piece on this case.

http://bit.ly/ePrbSB

Here is another blog I found which is based on the 60 Minute piece about Louis Allen.

http://bit.ly/hdc80x


Herbert Lee was the man murdered in front of Louis Allen by a member of the Mississippi State Legislature, E. H. Hurst. This happened on Sept. 25, 1961 in Liberty Mississippi. Hurst was aquitted after witness Louis Allen was pressured to say he saw Hurst attacked by Lee. Hurst never spent a night in jail.

http://bit.ly/rcCUqB





I never knew about Freedom Summer until I began reading Roots of Justice. Those who battled racism and Jim Crow in Mississippi were only a handful of the thousands of Civil Rights heros who have allowed our country to grow to the place it is at today. Without Freedom Summer I do not think we would be led by President Barrack Obama. Freedom Summer This is an accomplishment that has grown from the seeds planted in Mississippi in the early 1960s. Although Jim Crow has been abolished, racism, inequality, and discrimination still exist in America. The example of Troy Davis is one where America refuses to acknowledge this racism and injustice. There are many similarities between Troy Davis and the three men I wrote about from the Civil Rights movement in Mississippi.

http://bit.ly/p8cvtP



The power of the vote controls our freedoms as Americans. The struggle for voting rights was vitally important to African Americans taking they're destiny into they're own hands. The political environment in which these seeds were planted was one of revolution and change. In some ways it is similar to that of ours today. I think Civil Rights leaders knew this was an opportunity to vault their movement onto a national level and dig up our country's roots of justice.

# 2 Young Americans Don't Fight Back

I agree with many points that Bruce Levine brings up, but I also think that my generation has more to prove.

 Levine points out that generations of young adults have been passive, compliant, fearful and helpless. I agree that many young adults growing up today are stuck in debt, using prescription medication (unnecessarily), taught to comply (not to think for themselves), taught that grades are what matters (not learning), under surveillance, obsessed with TV, and caught in a world of consumerism. I myself, have experienced all of the barriers, many extensively.

• The first reason why young adults are not disrupting, Levine writes of, is student debt-loans, which I am currently a member of. I agree that many students need to take loans, and being in debt is something that holds you back. This is definitely a constraint which I feel every day. In many ways I feel like the loans I signed have strapped me down like a gurney. Because I am using loans I feel like I have a responsibility to finish school. This affects my behavior while I am at school because my priorities are towards my grades rather than anything else. If I ever did find the time to protest anything, my behavior at any kind of demonstration would definitely be affected by my loans.

• The second reason Levine gives is about children being treated for disruptive disorders like ODD. When I was younger I was disruptive in the classroom and was told I had ADD. I knew I didn't need medication for my behavior, but my parents had me try it. It wasn't long before I gave up taking the meds. I remember feeling like they were being pushed on me. Later I realized how much money is produced by giving these pills to kids like myself who disrupted classroom structure. Levine highlights a striking statistic when he said; "Heavily tranquilizing antipsychotic drugs (e.g. Zyprexa and Risperdal) are now the highest grossing class of medication in the United States ($16 billion in 2010)."

• Another one of Levine's reasons stood out to me as very relative in my life titled, "Shaming Young People Who Take Education—But Not Their Schooling—Seriously." I remember disliking school growing up in Seattle and by the time I was in middle school I was uninterested in my courses. My graduating class was the first to be required to pass all three prongs of the WASL standardized test in order to graduate. This was challenge for many students and created another fear for students struggling to graduate. When I arrived at WSU I found that schools can actually be student friendly and classrooms could be ruled by democracy. I think that WSU dose a great job of teaching students to think outside of box. I have taken multiple courses including this one, which offer an opportunity to earn a grade through, effort and a desire to learn rather than points on a test. I have found classes where discussion and critical thinking are present much more interesting and pedagogic.

Bruce Levine dose an excellent job bringing up many validated and concrete arguments about the control that is being exerted over young adults today. I think he has makes a great case about how these powers have great jurisdiction over the disruptive acts of an entire generation of students and young adults.

Here are a few other possible reasons contributing to Levine's argument that America’s youth resistance has been crushed.

• The first issue, which I think could be contributing to this, is the Internet. I think that Americans are too comfortable and too complacent, mainly because they are busy in front of the computer. Similar to what Levine noted about Television. I think the Internet is guiltier because it allows people to become Internet bullies, or Internet revolutionaries. Before the Internet people would protest in the streets and cause real disruption. Today it seems like more people are turning to the Internet to vent their frustrations and injustices. I think the Internet can be a great communication tool for organizers, but it has created people who are uninterested in participating in any real movements, outside of the blog board.

• The Second issue goes along with what Levine mentioned about surveillance in his article, and is the introduction of DNA and technology evidence in court cases. This is not only an issue with DNA but in general, the increase in crime scene investigation technology. GPS location technology and Radio Frequency Identification have made is possible to track your every move. This technology is great at solving crimes, but it is also very powerful at striking fear in the public. The overwhelming presence of CSI type TV shows has created a belief that this technology makes anything traceable. This fear is present in more than just the minds of criminals; I think it also could be present in schools and at the work place. People know that what they do can be tracked back to them through a number of different avenues, mostly with technology.

• The Third issue is the economy and the competition for jobs. Many employees have been laid off, and are entering an already cluttered employment market. This increase in demand for jobs, and decrease in open positions, is creating a society where people are afraid to, or just don't care about protesting or disrupting. If job security is the number one thought, and priority, then any kind of disruption is not an option.

# 1 Brands & Logos

I agree with Klein's argument that we cannot simply choose to ignore brands. Daily life in most of America includes an attack of advertisements, logos, and brands. This attack is more than just images on a screen; like Klein pointed out in the documentary No Logo, these companies are not only selling us their product but they are selling an idea, dream, or and an image that associates with, and gives value to their brand.

The majority of brands I came across while walking around campus included Coca-Cola, Doritos, Gatorade, Subway, and of course the biggest beast of them all Nike.

 Like many other students I see, I am wearing a pair of Nike sneakers to class. After lunch I walked back up to campus and noted seeing the "Swoosh" more than any other logo.

 This seems very casual on a college campus. Nike's logo is present on more shoes, t-shirts, shorts, and jerseys than any other brand. I think this is partially because of Nike's quality but also the terrific job of bombing their logo across the American public. As a Nike consumer myself, I feel the American public enjoys the products they produce but dose not realize the injustice their labor practices create globally.

This summer I traveled to Belize and noticed many locals walking the streets, mostly dirt roads, barefoot. I began to think about how common it is for people in other areas of the world to live without shoes at all. As I continued to roam the streets I saw people selling loads of shoes. The Nike logo instantly stood out, but the shoes sold on the street were not of the quality I would find at home. A few days later I was shopping at a corner store when a man approached me and asked me if he could buy the Nikes I was wearing. I was surprised, but refused to sell them. I knew Nike was  I now realize that Nike has created such a strong brand that it holds value around the world. Even people in Central America have been "bombed" by Nike.

To think of a world without the Swoosh, Adidas logo, or any other brand name seems unreal. I wonder what it was like in Pullman before Nikes, Reeboks, and Vans? I can't even imagine Edward Murrow wearing Nike shoes to class, or a Nike basketball jersey on a hot day.

As long as I have been alive Nike has been advertising their brand and logo. I think this goes for most of the young adults from my generation It's no surprise I have mostly Nike shoes in my closet. I think most Americans enjoy Nike products but the way they are made oversees is a world wide social justice issue.

I came across this video online, which highlights some of the injustice... 

Human trafficking in Nike's sweatshop factory in Malaysia - YouTube

This Australian news report illustrates some of the power Nike's international factories hold over the employees creating their products. This power includes using contracts and passports to trap workers. Living conditions as well as working conditions are horrible, and they have been for years. I think that globalization is negatively affected by Nike's international business because it is causing so much injustice for those who work in their factories. I think practices like this are also affecting the notion of post-democracy because even though the work is being done oversees America benefits from factories like these. It should be our duty as a democracy to insure that workers at our factories are given employment rights and decent wages.

Some possible response questions:

How can Americans change the practices of Nike's oversees practices?

What ways could employees at the Malaysian factory disrupt "Business as usual"?

If there were disruption, like a strike, from the employees at this factory how would the management at these factories react? What tactics would be likely used?